从群际关系的元知觉视角出发,通过三个研究考察了感知理解和中华民族认同的关系。研究1采用自陈量表进行调查,发现感知理解正向预测中华民族认同,群际信任发挥了中介作用。研究2操纵了感知理解,结果发现与感知不理解和控制组相比,感知理解组被试具有更强的中华民族认同,群际信任在其中起到中介作用。研究3区分了感知喜欢和感知理解,进一步验证了感知理解对中华民族认同的影响,结果发现相比感知喜欢,感知理解更能促进中华民族认同。综上可见,感知理解促进中华民族认同,群际信任起中介作用。研究结果丰富了感知理解的下游效应,对促进中华民族认同的前因变量和机制做出了原创性贡献,同时为铸牢中华民族共同体意识提供路径。
Abstract
Chinese national identity refers to people's conscious awareness and emotional attachment to the Chinese nation as an ethnic entity. It not only affects individuals' psychological well-being and behavioral adaptation, but also has important impacts on ethnic harmony, social stability, and national identity. However, current research on Chinese national identity has mainly focused on theoretical explanation and policy analysis, with relatively little empirical research. Most existing studies have used questionnaire surveys to explore correlations between Chinese national identity and other variables, without examining causal relationships. Moreover, current empirical research on factors influencing Chinese national identity has not yet considered intergroup meta-perceptions. Existing research has found that intergroup meta-perceptions influence attitudes toward outgroups. Therefore, for different ethnic groups in China, does feeling that outgroups understand one’s ingroup facilitate Chinese national identity? The present research through three studies explores the effect of felt understanding on Chinese national identity and its underlying mechanism.
Study 1 surveyed 367 college students to examine the relationships among felt understanding, intergroup trust, and Chinese national identity. Study 2 manipulated felt understanding using a single-factor between-subjects design, with 165 college students assigned to a felt understanding group, a felt no understanding group, or a control group. Participants' intergroup trust and Chinese national identity were measured after the manipulation. To further establish the effect of felt understanding rather than felt liking on Chinese national identity, Study 3 adopted a 2 (felt understanding: understanding vs. no understanding) × 2 (felt liking: liking vs. no liking) between-subjects design with 192 college students. Participants were first exposed to manipulations of felt understanding and felt liking before their Chinese national identity was measured.
Study 1 found that felt understanding positively predicted Chinese national identity, with intergroup trust partially mediating the relationships between felt understanding and shared ingroup identity (Chinese nation) and Chinese national identity. Intergroup trust fully mediated the relationship between felt understanding and the sense of Community for the Chinese Nation. Study 2 showed that, compared to felt no understanding group and control group, the felt understanding group scored higher on common ingroup identity (Chinese nation) and Chinese national identity. Furthermore, intergroup trust mediated the effect of felt understanding on common ingroup identity (Chinese nation) and Chinese national identity. Study 3 revealed a significant multivariate main effect of felt understanding. The univariate main effect of felt understanding was significant for common ingroup identity (Chinese nation) and the sense of community for the Chinese nation, indicating higher Chinese national identity in the felt understanding condition than in the felt no understanding condition. There was also a significant multivariate main effect of felt liking, while the univariate main effect of felt liking was only significant for common ingroup identity (Chinese nation) but not for the others. This suggests that felt understanding promotes Chinese national identity more effectively than felt liking, further confirming the facilitating effect of felt understanding on Chinese national identity.
The research found that felt understanding facilitates Chinese national identity, intergroup trust mediates the relationship between felt understanding and Chinese national identity and felt understanding promotes Chinese national identity more effectively than felt liking. This research enriches the downstream effects of felt understanding. From the perspective of meta-perceptions and in the context of China's multi-ethnic society, it is the first to explore the effect of felt understanding on Chinese national identity and its underlying mechanism. It makes an original contribution to the antecedent variables and mechanisms for promoting Chinese national identity. At the same time, it provides an evidence-based rather than speculative way to consolidate the sense of community for the Chinese nation.
关键词
感知理解 /
群际信任 /
中华民族认同 /
元知觉 /
共同内群体认同
Key words
felt understanding /
intergroup trust /
Chinese national identity /
meta-perception /
common ingroup identity
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈立鹏, 薛璐璐. (2021). 基于心理测量学的中华民族共同体意识量表的编制. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 41(2), 30-38.
[2] 陈立鹏, 薛璐璐, 范航. (2023). 和而不同: 民族交融态度对中华民族共同体意识的影响及其心理机制. 民族学刊, 14(4), 1-10, 134.
[3] 陈立鹏, 张利平. (2023). 集体记忆促进内隐中华民族认同: 基于SC-IAT任务. 民族教育研究, 34(6), 13-21.
[4] 冯勇. (2021). 族际信任研究述评. 新疆社科论坛, 1, 78-84.
[5] 高承海, 万明钢. (2013). 民族本质论对民族认同和刻板印象的影响. 心理学报, 45(2), 231-242.
[6] 胡晓檬, 韩雨芳, 喻丰, 彭凯平. (2021). 多元文化经历的双刃剑效应:心理后果与边界条件. 应用心理学, 27(1), 1-9.
[7] 李博, 赵玉芳, 游贝贝. (2018). 文化聚合观促进民族交往: 中华民族认同的中介作用. 社区心理学研究, 6(2), 89-105.
[8] 李静, 强健. (2021). 共同内群体认同视角下铸牢中华民族共同体意识研究. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 42(10), 1-8.
[9] 李雅宁, 杨伊生. (2022). 民族信任铸牢中华民族共同体意识的心理路径. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 43(9), 203-210.
[10] 刘琳. (2014). 近代以来川南苗汉族际通婚研究: 基于心理学的视角. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 34(3), 36-39.
[11] 孟乐, 叶灿, 王佳佳, 张积家. (2022). 内藏班高中生对国内外民族的容器隐喻、群际态度和助人倾向. 心理学报, 54(11), 1366-1380.
[12] 浦昆华, 尹可丽. (2022). 中华民族认同对少数民族青少年学校适应的影响: 亲社会倾向的中介作用. 民族论坛, 2, 24-32.
[13] 秦向荣, 佐斌. (2007). 民族认同的心理学实证研究——11~20岁青少年民族认同的结构和状况. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 6, 37-41, 155.
[14] 辛素飞, 明朗, 辛自强. (2013). 群际信任的增进: 社会认同与群际接触的方法. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 290-299.
[15] 尹可丽, 李鹏, 包广华, 王玉兰, 张积家. (2016). 民族社会化经历对藏族青少年积极心理健康的影响——民族认同与自尊的中介作用. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1, 78-84.
[16] 张积家, 冯晓慧. (2021). 中华民族共同体认同的心理建构与影响因素. 民族教育研究, 32(2), 5-14.
[17] 张莹瑞, 佐斌. (2012). 青少年中华民族认同、国家自豪感与内群体偏好的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(1), 86-88.
[18] Adachi P. J. C., Hodson G., Willoughby T., Blank C., & Ha A. (2016). From outgroups to allied forces: Effect of intergroup cooperation in violent and nonviolent video games on boosting favorable outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(3), 259-265.
[19] Berg J., Dickhaut J., & McCabe K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142.
[20] Brik T., Livingstone A. G., Chayinska M., & Bliznyuk E. (2024). How feeling understood predicts trust and willingness to forgive in the midst of violent intergroup conflict: Longitudinal evidence from Ukraine. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(5), 487-497.
[21] Cakal H., Halabi S., Cazan A.-M., & Eller A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48-67.
[22] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
[23] Du X. R., Livingstone A. G., & Adlam, A. L. R. (2024). Felt understanding as a bridge between social identity and wellbeing among international university students. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), Article e2722.
[24] Fowler, C., & Gasiorek, J. (2020). Implications of metastereotypes for attitudes toward intergenerational contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 48-70.
[25] Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Anastasio P. A., Bachman B. A., & Rust M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1-26.
[26] Hogg M. A.(2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 69-126). Elsevier Academic Press.
[27] Kappmeier, M. (2016). Trusting the enemy—towards a comprehensive understanding of trust in intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(2), 134-144.
[28] Livingstone, A. G. (2023). Felt understanding in intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 51, Article 101587.
[29] Livingstone A. G., Bedford S. L., Afyouni A., Vu N., Kapantai I., Makanju D., & Tapp C. (2024). You get us, so you like us: Feeling understood by an outgroup predicts more positive intergroup relations via perceived positive regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(2), 262-281.
[30] Livingstone A. G., Fernández Rodríguez L., & Rothers A. (2020). "They just don't understand us": The role of felt understanding in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 633-656.
[31] Lount, R. B., Jr. (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 420-433.
[32] Morelli S. A., Torre J. B., & Eisenberger N. I. (2014). The neural bases of feeling understood and not understood. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 1890-1896.
[33] Noor M., Brown R., Gonzalez R., Manzi J., & Lewis C. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 819-832.
[34] Phinney J. S., Jacoby B., & Silva C. (2007). Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(5), 478-490.
[35] Reimer N. K., Kamble S. V., Schmid K., & Hewstone M. (2022). Intergroup contact fosters more inclusive social identities. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 133-157.
[36] Simon B., Mommert A., & Renger D. (2015). Reaching across group boundaries: Respect from outgroup members facilitates recategorization as a common group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 616-628.
[37] Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183-190.
[38] Tam T., Hewstone M., Kenworthy J., & Cairns E. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 45-59.
[39] Tropp L. R., Stout A. M., Boatswain C., Wright S. C., & Pettigrew T. F. (2006). Trust and acceptance in response to references to group membership: Minority and majority perspectives on cross-group interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 769-794.
[40] Ufkes E. G., Dovidio J. F., & Tel G. (2015). Identity and collective action among European Kurds. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 176-186.
[41] Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 265-284.
基金
*本研究得到国家社会科学基金青年项目（24CMZ056）的资助
PDF(982 KB)
