[1] 陈立鹏, 薛璐璐. (2021). 基于心理测量学的中华民族共同体意识量表的编制. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 41(2), 30-38. [2] 陈立鹏, 薛璐璐, 范航. (2023). 和而不同: 民族交融态度对中华民族共同体意识的影响及其心理机制. 民族学刊, 14(4), 1-10, 134. [3] 陈立鹏, 张利平. (2023). 集体记忆促进内隐中华民族认同: 基于SC-IAT任务. 民族教育研究, 34(6), 13-21. [4] 冯勇. (2021). 族际信任研究述评. 新疆社科论坛, 1, 78-84. [5] 高承海, 万明钢. (2013). 民族本质论对民族认同和刻板印象的影响. 心理学报, 45(2), 231-242. [6] 胡晓檬, 韩雨芳, 喻丰, 彭凯平. (2021). 多元文化经历的双刃剑效应:心理后果与边界条件. 应用心理学, 27(1), 1-9. [7] 李博, 赵玉芳, 游贝贝. (2018). 文化聚合观促进民族交往: 中华民族认同的中介作用. 社区心理学研究, 6(2), 89-105. [8] 李静, 强健. (2021). 共同内群体认同视角下铸牢中华民族共同体意识研究. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 42(10), 1-8. [9] 李雅宁, 杨伊生. (2022). 民族信任铸牢中华民族共同体意识的心理路径. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 43(9), 203-210. [10] 刘琳. (2014). 近代以来川南苗汉族际通婚研究: 基于心理学的视角. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 34(3), 36-39. [11] 孟乐, 叶灿, 王佳佳, 张积家. (2022). 内藏班高中生对国内外民族的容器隐喻、群际态度和助人倾向. 心理学报, 54(11), 1366-1380. [12] 浦昆华, 尹可丽. (2022). 中华民族认同对少数民族青少年学校适应的影响: 亲社会倾向的中介作用. 民族论坛, 2, 24-32. [13] 秦向荣, 佐斌. (2007). 民族认同的心理学实证研究——11~20岁青少年民族认同的结构和状况. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 6, 37-41, 155. [14] 辛素飞, 明朗, 辛自强. (2013). 群际信任的增进: 社会认同与群际接触的方法. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 290-299. [15] 尹可丽, 李鹏, 包广华, 王玉兰, 张积家. (2016). 民族社会化经历对藏族青少年积极心理健康的影响——民族认同与自尊的中介作用. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1, 78-84. [16] 张积家, 冯晓慧. (2021). 中华民族共同体认同的心理建构与影响因素. 民族教育研究, 32(2), 5-14. [17] 张莹瑞, 佐斌. (2012). 青少年中华民族认同、国家自豪感与内群体偏好的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(1), 86-88. [18] Adachi P. J. C., Hodson G., Willoughby T., Blank C., & Ha A. (2016). From outgroups to allied forces: Effect of intergroup cooperation in violent and nonviolent video games on boosting favorable outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(3), 259-265. [19] Berg J., Dickhaut J., & McCabe K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. [20] Brik T., Livingstone A. G., Chayinska M., & Bliznyuk E. (2024). How feeling understood predicts trust and willingness to forgive in the midst of violent intergroup conflict: Longitudinal evidence from Ukraine. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(5), 487-497. [21] Cakal H., Halabi S., Cazan A.-M., & Eller A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48-67. [22] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. [23] Du X. R., Livingstone A. G., & Adlam, A. L. R. (2024). Felt understanding as a bridge between social identity and wellbeing among international university students. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), Article e2722. [24] Fowler, C., & Gasiorek, J. (2020). Implications of metastereotypes for attitudes toward intergenerational contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 48-70. [25] Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Anastasio P. A., Bachman B. A., & Rust M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1-26. [26] Hogg M. A.(2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 69-126). Elsevier Academic Press. [27] Kappmeier, M. (2016). Trusting the enemy—towards a comprehensive understanding of trust in intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(2), 134-144. [28] Livingstone, A. G. (2023). Felt understanding in intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 51, Article 101587. [29] Livingstone A. G., Bedford S. L., Afyouni A., Vu N., Kapantai I., Makanju D., & Tapp C. (2024). You get us, so you like us: Feeling understood by an outgroup predicts more positive intergroup relations via perceived positive regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(2), 262-281. [30] Livingstone A. G., Fernández Rodríguez L., & Rothers A. (2020). "They just don't understand us": The role of felt understanding in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 633-656. [31] Lount, R. B., Jr. (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 420-433. [32] Morelli S. A., Torre J. B., & Eisenberger N. I. (2014). The neural bases of feeling understood and not understood. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 1890-1896. [33] Noor M., Brown R., Gonzalez R., Manzi J., & Lewis C. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 819-832. [34] Phinney J. S., Jacoby B., & Silva C. (2007). Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(5), 478-490. [35] Reimer N. K., Kamble S. V., Schmid K., & Hewstone M. (2022). Intergroup contact fosters more inclusive social identities. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 133-157. [36] Simon B., Mommert A., & Renger D. (2015). Reaching across group boundaries: Respect from outgroup members facilitates recategorization as a common group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 616-628. [37] Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183-190. [38] Tam T., Hewstone M., Kenworthy J., & Cairns E. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 45-59. [39] Tropp L. R., Stout A. M., Boatswain C., Wright S. C., & Pettigrew T. F. (2006). Trust and acceptance in response to references to group membership: Minority and majority perspectives on cross-group interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 769-794. [40] Ufkes E. G., Dovidio J. F., & Tel G. (2015). Identity and collective action among European Kurds. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 176-186. [41] Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 265-284. |