Object recognition has attracted a great deal of theoretical attention, and a number of competing explanations have been offered.The object-centered theory assumed an explicit treatment of structure in recognition, pointing out that the latter task can be made especially easy by the availability of a “structural description” of the object. By contrast, the view-centered theory posited that objects are represented as collections of entire viewpoint. In the current study, made 3D objects as experimental materials according to the idea of Biederman’s small geons; used the priming paradigm and a 4-alternative forced choice design. The participant responded to each target object by pressing one of four keys on the computer keyboard (‘F’ ,‘G’,‘H’,‘J’). The experiment 1 was conducted with a 3(displacement level on the two parts: no displacement, half displacement and full displacement) ×2(prime type: part and whole)within-subject design. The relative position of parts was manipulated by displacing one relative to the other. And the experiment 2 was conducted with a 3(location prime: same position, close position, distance position) ×2（prime type: part and whole）within-subject design. The relative location of objects was manipulated by displacing one relative to the other. The results are as follows: (1)the influence of displacement level and location is hierarchical. (2) On the no displacement and same location level , the speed of the whole prime was faster than the part prime. But on the full displacement and distance location level , the part prime was faster than the whole prime. These conclusions suppose that the “what” representation stage can be divided into part features and whole features, also the “where” representation stage can be divided into self-construction (displacement) and relative-construction(location).The finding not only extended the field of object recognition, but also shed light on the integration between the two object theories.