Visual form memory is critical for the acquisition of written language. Previous studies on visual word learning and gender differences in face memory have indicated that encoding strategy (i.e., whole-based encoding and part-based encoding) may affect the memory of visual stimuli. The whole- and part-based encoding respectively mean participants’ specific focus on the whole information and part information during encoding. Nevertheless, it still lacks of direct experimental evidence for the impact of encoding strategy on visual form memory. Therefore, the current study aimed to explore the impact of encoding strategy on visual form memory and its consistency across different writing systems. To address the above questions, the present study conducted two experiments, in which the study-test paradigm and within-subject design were used. Experiment 1 examined the impact of encoding strategy on visual form memory, and Experiment 2 further examined the consistency of the encoding-strategy effect across different writing systems. During the study phase, participants were asked to memorize the visual forms of 80 Korean Hangul characters in Experiment 1 and those of 96 English pseudowords in Experiment 2. Both experiments consisted of two conditions (i.e., whole-based encoding and part-based encoding). The learning materials in the two conditions and the order of the two conditions were counterbalances across participants. The whole- and part-based encoding strategies were induced by including randomly-presented trials for whole-word judgment or unit judgment in the learning sequence, respectively. Specifically, participants were instructed to judge whether the probe stimulus was the same as the target word in whole-based encoding condition and whether the probe stimulus was a unit of the target word in part-based encoding condition. A recognition memory test was administered one hour after the learning phase. To ensure that whole- and part-based encoding strategies were respectively induced by the whole-word judgment task and unit judgment task, an interview on each participant’s encoding strategies was additionally conducted in Experiment 2. Results on interview showed that the whole- and part-based encoding strategies were successfully induced by whole-word judgment and unit judgment, respectively. More importantly, in both experiments, we found that participants showed advantages in visual form memory in the part-based encoding condition relative to whole-based encoding condition. Furthermore, the advantages for part-based encoding over whole-based encoding were evident for both Korean words and English pseudowords. In other words, the memory superiority for part-based encoding were consistent across different writing systems (i.e., logographic and alphabetic writings). These results suggest that part-based encoding relative to whole-based encoding facilitates visual form memory. In conclusion, the present study investigated the impact of encoding strategy on visual form memory and its cross-language consistency by manipulating part- and whole-based encoding during the learning phase. This study provided direct evidence for the advantages for part-based encoding relative to whole-based encoding, and revealed that such memory advantages were consistent across different writing systems. The advantages for part-based encoding can be explained by hemispheric specialization view or levels of processing view, and have important implications for word learning and teaching, especially for the learning of words with complicated visual forms such as Chinese and Korean words.