The Impact and Intervention of the Approach-Avoidance Tendencies on the Ensemble Coding of Emotional Facial Expressions in a Crowd

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240501

Abstract

Abstract: Previous studies have investigated the approach-avoidance response to emotional faces and the processing characteristics of facial emotional ensemble coding as separate entities. However, there is a lack of research that has integrated these two aspects to explore the potential influence of approach-avoidance tendencies, induced by the same set of emotional facial expressions on facial expression ensemble encoding. To address this research gap, we conducted two logically progressive experiments by combining the classic approach-avoidance task with the emotional facial expression ensemble task. The goal was to investigate the potential impact of emotional approach-avoidance tendencies on the ensemble coding of facial emotions. Furthermore, we aimed to explore whether the motivational dimensions of emotional stimuli modulate the ensemble coding of facial emotions from the perspective of motivational orientation theory.
The experiment was programmed using Presentation software (Neurobehavioral Systems Inc.) and presented on a 21-inch Dell monitor. Experiment 1 employed a 2 (emotional valence: positive vs negative) × 2 (motivational orientation: approach vs. avoidance) within-subjects design. The dependent variable was the mean error value of face emotion ensemble coding ($\mathrm{ME}=\frac{\sum \text { |test-mean }}{n}$). The positive or negative faces were presented in two ways: approaching and withdrawing. Participants were instructed to perceive the mean emotion of the group faces. They were then asked to use the mouse wheel to adjust the emotion of the test face to match the mean emotion of the group faces. Experiment 2 was simplified based on the results of Experiment 1. The positive faces from the ensemble coding task in Experiment 1 were discarded. A 2 (group: experimental group vs. control group) × 2 (motivational orientation: approach vs. avoidance) two-factor mixed design was used in Experiment 2. This experiment consisted of four phases: an emotional state pre-test, a sentence arrangement task, an emotional state post-test, and a group face ensemble coding task. The “experimental group-control group” design was adopted, and different sentence arrangement tasks were set up before the face emotion ensemble coding task. This was done to test whether implicit emotion regulation strategies could reduce the influence of negative avoidance tendencies on face emotion ensemble coding.
The results of Experiment 1 revealed a significant interaction between emotional valence and motivational orientation in the face emotional ensemble coding task (p < .05). Further analysis showed that the error in coding negative faces in the approach condition was significantly higher than in the avoidance condition. Additionally, the average error in ensemble coding for negative faces in the avoidance condition was significantly lower than for positive faces. In Experiment 2, the results showed a significant interaction between group and motivational orientation (p < .01). The simple effect analysis indicated that there was no significant difference in the mean error between the approach and avoidance conditions in the experimental group. However, in the control group, the mean error in the approach condition was significantly higher than in the avoidance condition, which was consistent with the findings in Experiment 1. Moreover, the mean error in approach conditions in the control group was significantly higher than that in the experimental group.
In conclusion, this study provides evidence that emotional avoidance tendency has an impact on face emotion ensemble coding, while a cognitive reappraisal strategy can eliminate this effect. It supports the motivational orientation theory and challenges the event coding theory. Furthermore, it highlights the significant influence of the motivational dimension of emotional stimuli on emotion perception. The key conclusions are as follows: (1) Negative avoidance tendencies can affect the ensemble coding of emotional faces and induce perceptual biases. (2) Implicit cognitive reappraisal can reduce negative avoidance tendency and regulate its influence on the ensemble coding of emotional faces.

Key words: ensemble coding, emotion in facial crowd, the approach-avoidance tendency, emotion regulation

摘要： 将“趋近-回避”任务与面孔情绪平均辨别任务结合,通过两个实验考察趋避倾向对面孔情绪集群编码的影响及其干预。实验1以逼近和远离两种方式呈现情绪面孔以诱发趋避倾向,从而检验其对面孔情绪集群编码的影响。实验2则在实验1任务前安排句子整理任务以启动内隐认知重评,进而检验认知重评策略能否干预趋避倾向对面孔情绪集群编码的影响。研究结果发现：(1)个体对负性面孔的回避倾向相较趋近倾向能够显著影响面孔情绪集群编码的精度,从而出现“趋利避害相容效应”中的“避害相容效应”;(2)运用内隐认知重评可以减少回避倾向对于面孔情绪集群编码的影响,从而消除此“避害相容效应”。以上发现有力地支持了动机定向理论。

关键词: 集群编码, 群体面孔情绪, 趋避倾向, 情绪调节

Lai Tingting, Zhu Wujing, Lin Zengzhen, Wang Xiaoqin, Jia Lei. The Impact and Intervention of the Approach-Avoidance Tendencies on the Ensemble Coding of Emotional Facial Expressions in a Crowd[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(5): 1026-1035.

赖婷婷, 祝吴静, 林增臻, 王小琴, 贾磊. 趋避倾向对面孔情绪集群编码的影响及其干预^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(5): 1026-1035.

References

[1] 白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(11), 719-722.
[2] 袁加锦, 张祎程, 陈圣栋, 罗利, 茹怡珊. (2021). 中国情绪调节词语库的初步编制与试用. 心理学报, 53(5), 445-455.
[3] 张卫东, 刁静, Schick, C. J. (2004). 正、负性情绪的跨文化心理测量: PANAS维度结构检验. 心理科学, 27(1), 77-79.
[4] Bai Y., Leib A. Y., Puri A. M., Whitney D., & Peng K. P. (2015). Gender differences in crowd perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1300.
[5] Balcetis, E. (2016). Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review, 8(2), 115-128.
[6] Dodgson, D. B., & Raymond, J. E. (2020). Value associations bias ensemble perception. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(1), 109-117.
[7] Elias E., Dyer M., & Sweeny T. D. (2016). Ensemble perception of dynamic emotional groups. Psychological Science, 28(2), 193-203.
[8] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., & Buchner A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
[9] Fini C., Fischer M., Bardi L., Brass M., & Moors A. (2020). Support from a TMS/MEP study for a direct link between positive/negative stimuli and approach/avoidance tendencies. Neuropsychologia, 143, Article 107496.
[10] Givon E., Berkovich R., Oz-Cohen E., Rubinstein K., Singer-Landau E., Udelsman-Danieli G., & Meiran N. (2023). Are women truly “more emotional” than men? sex differences in an indirect model-based measure of emotional feelings. Current Psychology, 42(36), 32469-32482.
[11] Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2009). Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 718-734.
[12] Im H. Y., Albohn D. N., Steiner T. G., Cushing C. A., Adams R. B. Jr., & Kveraga K. (2017). Differential hemispheric and visual stream contributions to ensemble coding of crowd emotion. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 828-842.
[13] Jia L., Cheng M. R., Lu J. H., Wu Y. P., & Wang J. (2023). Context consistency improves ensemble perception of facial expressions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 30(1), 280-290.
[14] Kozlik J., Neumann R., & Lozo L. (2015). Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: On the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 563.
[15] Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-Based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), Article 2515245920951503.
[16] Lang P. J., Bradley M. M., & Cuthbert B. N. (2001). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings.University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
[17] Munneke J., Duymaz İ., & Corbett J. E. (2022). Value-driven effects on perceptual averaging. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 84(3), 781-794.
[18] Neumann, R., & Schneider, L. J. (2024). What is in a smile: The role of evaluation goal and response labels in facial muscle responses to prejudiced groups. Psychophysiology, 61(3), Article e14518.
[19] Robertd T., Cant J. S., & Nestor A. (2019). Elucidating the neural representation and the processing dynamics of face ensembles. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(39), 7737-7747.
[20] Roskes M., Elliot A. J., Nijstad B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Avoidance motivation and conservation of energy. Emotion Review, 5(3), 264-268.
[21] Scherer, K. R., & Moors, A. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 719-745.
[22] Shahane A. D., Lopez R. B., & Denny B. T. (2019). Implicit reappraisal as an emotional buffer: Reappraisal-related neural activity moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress during exposure to negative stimuli. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(2), 355-365.
[23] Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1578-1593.
[24] Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220-247.
[25] Tottenham N., Tanaka J. W., Leon A. C., McCarry T., Nurse M., Hare T. A., & Nelson C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242-249.
[26] van Peer J. M., Rotteveel M., Spinhoven P., Tollenaar M. S., & Roelofs K. (2010). Affect-congruent approach and withdrawal movements of happy and angry faces facilitate affective categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24(5), 863-875.
[27] Wang H. Y., Xu G. Q., Ni M. F., Zhang C. H., Sun X. P., Chang Y., & Zhang B. W. (2017). Neural mechanisms of implicit cognitive reappraisal: Preceding descriptions alter emotional response to unpleasant images. Neuroscience, 347, 65-75.
[28] Watson D., Clark L. A., & Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
[29] Whitney, D., & Yamanashi Leib, A. (2018). Ensemble perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 105-129.
[30] Wolz I., Nannt J., & Svaldi J. (2020). Laboratory-based interventions targeting food craving: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews, 21(5), e12996.
[31] Wong S. F., Krause S., Marishel D., & Grisham J. R. (2021). Reappraisal of disgust: Self-report and behavioural assessment of individuals with moderate to high contamination fears. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 78, 102346.
[32] Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24(1), 3-47.