Given that little is known about the impact of ostracism on employees in Chinese workplace, and even less research has investigated gender differences in terms of workplace exclusionary behavior. The current study explored the applicability of Workplace Ostracism Scale (WOS) in China and gender differences on psychological health and job satisfaction. Workplace Ostracism Scale (WOS), Psychological Health Questionnaire and Job Satisfaction Questionnaire were used to test a sample of 437 employees with diverse job titles. The WOS was translated into Chinese upon careful consideration. Based on 137 samples (57 men and 80 women), some revisions were made according to the result of item-total correlation and exploratory factor analysis. Then 300 employees (160 men, 136 women and 4 unknown) from various companies were invited to join the final survey. The reliability and construct validity of WOS were tested by internal consistency reliability and confirmatory factor analysis. Results of item analysis showed that the correlations between the ten items of WOS and the total score ranged from 0.36 to 0.86. All correlations listed were significant at p<0.01. Exploratory factor analysis showed that 10 items had two factors. However, there was only one item in the second factor. Based on further examination, it was found that this item was a rather general statement, while others were all about the specific descriptions. So it was best to eliminate the first item. Then, EFA was conducted on the left nine items. Results showed that all nine items had one factor with an eigenvalue 5.26. This factor can explain 58.50% variance. Internal consistency reliability and confirmatory factor analysis were used to confirm the reliability and construct validity of WOS. Results showed that after eliminating the first statement of the scale, the WOS was a reliable and valid measure in Chinese workplace as well. To test whether gender moderated the relationship between exclusion and outcomes, a moderated hierarchical regression analysis was conducted on psychological health and job satisfaction. For each analysis researchers first entered the main effects for workplace ostracism and gender. In the second step, we entered the interaction term between ostracism and gender. Consistent with predictions, the addition of the interaction resulted in a significant change in R2. To illustrate this interaction, a low workplace ostracism group and a high workplace ostracism group were created for each gender. The results demonstrated the moderating effect of gender on the relation between workplace ostracism and psychological health and job satisfaction. The present study provided a useful measure for Chinese workplace ostracism literature — the revised WOS. It was also demonstrated that, the effects of ostracism were, in fact, moderated by gender. Specifically, workplace ostracism was predicted to have a stronger negative impact on psychological health and job satisfaction of women compared to men. Overall, workplace ostracism cannot be neglected. Special attention should be drawn on this phenomenon.
Self-esteem has certain similarities and differences in different cultural backgrounds. According to previous findings, the cultural differences of self-esteem are manifested in its roots, inclusiveness and its expression. To a certain degree, social cultural values shape self-esteem of people lived in the cultural context. The source of self-esteem embodies the importance of cultural values. People in the individualism culture emphasize the importance of personal self-esteem, which reliance on personal achievement and characteristic, relative to collective self-esteem. Whereas collectivist place more emphasis on social orientation and its collective aspect compared with former. The extent of inclusion of other in self concept is various in different cultures. Self-esteem, as an important aspect of the self concept, has cultural differences in its inclusiveness. People in Western cultures centralize the personal uniqueness and independence. Their self-esteem focus on the unique self aspect compared to Chinese who include the significant others into their self-esteem. Culture influences the ways that taken in the expression of self-esteem. Easterners are much less direct express favorable evaluations of self explicitly and in the public context. They tend to make positive self evaluation when they respond implicitly or in the private context. In contrast, people in Western cultures attempt to maintain a positive self evaluation by engaging in various self enhancement strategies. They express their favorable self evaluation directly when they respond explicitly or in the public context. The awareness of cultural differences and universality of self-esteem should be set up. It is of great important to strengthen the study on cultural differences of it for scientific understanding of the social psychological phenomenon and academic discipline construction. Future research should focus on the meaning of self-esteem, its research content and research methods, to further promote the self-esteem study in the Chinese background.
There was a great deal of empirical research on narcissism in Western psychological field. This research relied on the theoretical studying of predecessors, explored undergraduate students’ narcissism and its relationship with mental adaptation. The results showed: (1) There wasn’t significant difference in Narcissism by sexual distinction. But there was significant difference in mental adaptation. Men students were better than women students in mental adaptation. (2) Students from different specialized subjects had not significant difference in Narcissism. But there was significant difference in mental adaptation. (3) Compared with narcissism and 4 factors of mental adaptation, there was relationship between narcissism with mental self-control and self-confidence.
The period in primary school is important for children’s personality development. Peer plays an important role in personality formation and its development for children. We explored the effect of peer acceptance and friendship quality on personality development of primary school students in individual and class levels, by involving the peer factor as a circumstance variable, centralizing the peer acceptance and friendship quality in the within-class group respectively and aggregating individual peer acceptance and friendship quality as two class-level variables. We examined how peer acceptance and friendship quality influenced the personality development in primary school students on both individual and class levels. Our research breaks the limitation of ignoring the influence of class level social and psychological context effect in previous studies. We selected 700 participants as mutual friends with class for the unit, which were from 23 classes and 6 grades (1-6), using best friend nomination method. The data was collected by adopting peer nomination method and handing out the primary school students’ friendship quality questionnaire and the teacher-assessment primary school students’ personality development questionnaire. According to the lower-level mediation model (1-1-1), we respectively regarded the five dimensions of personality (intelligence, extraversion, pro-sociality, conscientiousness and emotional stability) as dependent variables in Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM), and examined the multilevel mediation effect of friendship quality on the relationship of peer acceptance and each dimension of personality by the multilevel mediation effect test procedures. The result indicates that:for example intelligence, the average level of peer acceptance in class has no a direct effect on intelligence(t=-0.090,p>0.05). Controlling the effects of class level, peer acceptance significantly predicting effects on intelligence in the path c(t=5.010,p<0.001).Peer acceptance have significance predicting effects on friendship quality in the path a(t=2.438,p<0.05), friendship quality and peer acceptance have significance predicting effects on intelligence in the path b and c'[b(t=3.308,p<0.05)and c'(t=5.065,p<0.001)] . Individual level, peer acceptance of the direct effects on intelligent is reduced to 1.4292 from 1.4978. Consequently, primary school students'friendship quality partly mediates the relationship between peer acceptance and intelligence on individual level. Mediator effect is ab( × )=7.18%,mediator effect size is ab/(ab+c')=4.78%.We adopt the same procedure as above on other dimensions of personality. The conclusion shows that:(1)In class level, the average level of friendship quality in class has a direct effect on extraversion, pro-sociality, conscientiousness, emotional stability. The average level of peer acceptance in class has a direct effect on emotional stability.(2)In individual level, peer acceptance has a direct effect on the five dimensions of personality(intelligence, extraversion, pro-sociality, conscientiousness and emotional stability). Primary school students’ friendship quality partly mediates the relationship between peer acceptance and personality (intelligence, extraversion, pro-sociality, conscientiousness).