心理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1036-1045.DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230502
韩书, 陈亚勤, 郑本汇源, 王雅欣, 尹彬**
出版日期:
2023-09-20
发布日期:
2023-11-07
通讯作者:
**尹彬,E-mail: byin@fjnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Han Shu, Chen Yaqin, Zheng Benhuiyuan, Wang Yaxin, Yin Bin
Online:
2023-09-20
Published:
2023-11-07
摘要: 近年利用啮齿动物模型探究帮助行为动机成为新趋势,共情、减轻自身痛苦和社会接触欲望等被认为是啮齿动物做出帮助行为的动机。本研究以108只Sprague-Dawley大鼠为被试,改进了Carvalheiro等(2019)的帮助行为实验装置,以三个实验探究啮齿动物帮助行为的主要动机。研究结果表明:(1)不论暗室是否存在,社会接触欲望和追求有趣环境是帮助行为的主要动机;(2)自身痛苦的减轻以及之前的社会接触经历而非受困经历有助于帮助行为的发生及持续性;(3)共情或许并非帮助行为的主要动机,而是对帮助行为过程的描述。
韩书, 陈亚勤, 郑本汇源, 王雅欣, 尹彬. 啮齿动物帮助行为动机的实证研究 *[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1036-1045.
Han Shu, Chen Yaqin, Zheng Benhuiyuan, Wang Yaxin, Yin Bin. An Empirical Study on The Motivation of Helping Behavior in Rodents[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2023, 46(5): 1036-1045.
[1] 黄翯青, 苏彦捷. (2012). 共情的毕生发展: 一个双过程的视角. 心理发展与教育, 28(4), 434-441. [2] 王启忱, 刘赞, 苏彦捷. (2021). 共情的毕生发展及其神经基础. 中国科学: 生命科学, 51(6), 717-729. [3] 魏祺, 苏彦捷. (2019). 学龄前儿童中的共情及其不同成分. 心理技术与应用, 7(9), 523-535. [4] Bailey K. R.,& Crawley, J. N. (2009). Chapter 5: Anxiety-related behaviors in mice In J J Buccafusco (Ed), Methods of behavior analysis in neuroscience CRC Press Anxiety-related behaviors in mice. In J. J. Buccafusco (Ed.), Methods of behavior analysis in neuroscience. CRC Press. [5] Bamberger P. A., Geller D., & Doveh E. (2017). Assisting upon entry: Helping type and approach as moderators of how role conflict affects newcomer resource drain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1719-1732. [6] Bartal I. B. A., Breton J. M., Sheng H. J., Long K. L., Chen S., Halliday A., & Kaufer D. (2021). Neural correlates of ingroup bias for prosociality in rats. eLife, 10, Article e65582. [7] Bartal I. B. A., Decety J., & Mason P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science, 334(6061), 1427-1430. [8] Bartal I. B. A., Rodgers D. A., Sarria M. S. B., Decety J., & Mason P. (2014). Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. eLife, 3, Article e01385. [9] Bartal I. B. A., Shan H. Z., Molasky N. M. R., Murray T. M., Williams J. Z., Decety J., & Mason P. (2016). Anxiolytic treatment impairs helping behavior in rats. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 850. [10] Bibb L., James M., Virginia J., Bernard L., & Howard C. (1972). Stimulus determinants of social attraction in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79(1), 13-21. [11] Brown R. E.(1979). Mammalian social odors: A critical review. In J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer, & M. C. Busnel (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 103-162).Academic Press. [12] Burkett J. P., Andari E., Johnson Z. V., Curry D. C., de Waal, F. B. M., & Young L. J. (2016). Oxytocin-dependent consolation behavior in rodents. Science, 351(6271), 375-378. [13] Campos A. C., Ferreira F. R., Guimarães F. S., & Lemos J. I. (2010). Facilitation of endocannabinoid effects in the ventral hippocampus modulates anxiety-like behaviors depending on previous stress experience. Neuroscience, 167(2), 238-246. [14] Carvalheiro J., Seara-Cardoso A., Mesquita A. R., de Sousa L., Oliveira P., Summavielle T., & Magalhães A. (2019). Helping behavior in rats (Rattus norvegicus) when an escape alternative is present. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 133(4), 452-462. [15] Clay, Z., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2013a). Bonobos respond to distress in others: Consolation across the age spectrum. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55206. [16] Clay, Z., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2013b). Development of socio-emotional competence in bonobos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(45), 18121-18126. [17] Conti G., Hansman C., Heckman J. J., Novak M. F. X., Ruggiero A., & Suomi S. J. (2012). Primate evidence on the late health effects of early-life adversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8866-8871. [18] Cox, S. S., & Reichel, C. M. (2020). Rats display empathic behavior independent of the opportunity for social interaction. Neuropsychopharmacology, 45(7), 1097-1104. [19] de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). With a little help from a friend. PLoS Biology, 5(7), Article e190. [20] de Waal, F. B. M., & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: Behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), 498-509. [21] Galef, B. G., & Wigmore, S. W. (1983). Transfer of information concerning distant foods: A laboratory investigation of the ‘information-centre’ hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 31(3), 748-758. [22] Gerber N., Schweinfurth M. K., & Taborsky M. (2020). The smell of cooperation: Rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1939), Article 20202327. [23] Giner Torréns M., Dreizler K., & Kärtner J. (2021). Insight into toddlers’ motivation to help: From social participants to prosocial contributors. Infant Behavior and Development, 64, Article 101603. [24] Gonzalez-Liencres C., Juckel G., Tas C., Friebe A., & Brüne M. (2014). Emotional contagion in mice: The role of familiarity. Behavioural Brain Research, 263, 16-21. [25] Graham, K. L., & Burghardt, G. M. (2010). Current perspectives on the biological study of play: Signs of progress. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 85(4), 393-418. [26] Hachiga Y., Schwartz L. P., Silberberg A., Kearns D. N., Gomez M., &Slotnick B. (2018). Does a rat free a trapped rat due to empathy or for sociality? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110(2), 267-274. [27] Harlow, H. F., & Zimmermann, R. R. (1959). Affectional responses in the infant monkey. Science, 130(3373), 421-432. [28] Havlik J. L., Vieira Sugano Y. Y., Jacobi M. C., Kukreja R. R., Jacobi J. H. C., & Mason P. (2020). The bystander effect in rats. Science Advances, 6(28), Article eabb4205. [29] Hepach R., Vaish A., & Tomasello M. (2012). Young children are intrinsically motivated to see others helped. Psychological Science, 23(9), 967-972. [30] Hernandez-Lallement J., Attah A. T., Soyman E., Pinhal C. M., Gazzola V., & Keysers C. (2020). Harm to others acts as a negative reinforcer in rats. Current Biology, 30(6), 949-961.e7. [31] Heslin, K. A., & Brown, M. F. (2021). No preference for prosocial helping behavior in rats with concurrent social interaction opportunities. Learning and Behavior, 49(4), 397-404. [32] Hiura L. C., Tan L., & Hackenberg T. D. (2018). To free, or not to free: Social reinforcement effects in the social release paradigm with rats. Behavioural Processes, 152, 37-46. [33] Horner V., Carter J. D., Suchak M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2011). Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(33), 13847-13851. [34] Kandis S., Ates M., Kizildag S., Camsari G. B., Yuce Z., Guvendi G., & Uysal N. (2018). Acetaminophen (paracetamol) affects empathy-like behavior in rats: Dose-response relationship. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 175, 146-151. [35] Keysers C., Knapska E., Moita M. A., & Gazzola V. (2022). Emotional contagion and prosocial behavior in rodents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(8), 688-706. [36] Knapska E., Mikosz M., Werka T., & Maren S. (2010). Social modulation of learning in rats. Learning and Memory, 17(1), 35-42. [37] Koski, S. E., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2010). Empathic chimpanzees: A proposal of the levels of emotional and cognitive processing in chimpanzee empathy. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 38-66. [38] Langford D. J., Crager S. E., Shehzad Z., Smith S. B., Sotocinal S. G., Levenstadt J. S., & Mogil J. S. (2006). Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice. Science, 312(5782), 1967-1970. [39] Lavery, J. J., & Foley, P. J. (1963). Altruism or arousal in the rat? Science, 140(3563), 172-173. [40] Lu Y. F., Ren B., Ling B. F., Zhang J., Xu C., & Li Z. (2018). Social interaction with a cagemate in pain increases allogrooming and induces pain hypersensitivity in the observer rats. Neuroscience Letters, 662, 385-388. [41] Márquez C., Rennie S. M., Costa D. F., & Moita M. A. (2015). Prosocial choice in rats depends on food-seeking behavior displayed by recipients. Current Biology, 25(13), 1736-1745. [42] Mason, P. (2016). Helping another in distress: Lessons from rats. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of morality (pp. 177-194).Springer. [43] Mason, P. (2021). Lessons from helping behavior in rats. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 68, 52-56. [44] Meyza K. Z., Bartal I. B. A., Monfils M. H., Panksepp J. B., & Knapska E. (2017). The roots of empathy: Through the lens of rodent models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 76, 216-234. [45] Michael, J., & Székely, M. (2019). Goal slippage: A mechanism for spontaneous instrumental helping in infancy? Topoi, 38(1), 173-183. [46] Mogil, J. S. (2012). The surprising empathic abilities of rodents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 143-144. [47] Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (1997). The prejuvenile onset of play fighting in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Developmental Psychobiology, 31(3), 193-205. [48] Pitman D. L., Ottenweller J. E., & Natelson B. H. (1988). Plasma corticosterone levels during repeated presentation of two intensities of restraint stress: Chronic stress and habituation. Physiology and Behavior, 43(1), 47-55. [49] Rice, G. E., & Gainer, P. (1962). “Altruism” in the albino rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 123-125. [50] Rutte, C., & Taborsky, M. (2007). Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biology, 5(7), Article e196. [51] Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. [52] Sato N., Tan L., Tate K., & Okada M. (2015). Rats demonstrate helping behavior toward a soaked conspecific. Animal Cognition, 18(5), 1039-1047. [53] Schmelz M., Grueneisen S., Kabalak A., Jost J., & Tomasello M. (2017). Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(28), 7462-7467. [54] Schneeberger K., Röder G., & Taborsky M. (2020). The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need. PLoS Biology, 18(3), Article e3000628. [55] Schwartz L. P., Silberberg A., Casey A. H., Kearns D. N., & Slotnick B. (2017). Does a rat release a soaked conspecific due to empathy? Animal Cognition, 20(2), 299-308. [56] Silberberg A., Allouch C., Sandfort S., Kearns D., Karpel H., & Slotnick B. (2014). Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain “rescue” behavior in rats. Animal Cognition, 17(3), 609-618. [57] Snippe E., Jeronimus B. F., aan het Rot M., Bos E. H., de Jonge P., & Wichers M. (2018). The reciprocity of prosocial behavior and positive affect in daily life. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 139-146. [58] Stukas A. A.,& Clary, E. G. (2012). Altruism and helping behavior. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 100-107).Academic Press. [59] Templer V. L., Wise T. B., Dayaw K. I. T., & Dayaw, J. N. T. (2018). Nonsocially housed rats (Ratus norvegicus) seek social interactions and social novelty more than socially housed counterparts. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 132(3), 240-252. [60] Tokuyama N., Toda K., Poiret M. L., Iyokango B., Bakaa B., & Ishizuka S. (2021). Two wild female bonobos adopted infants from a different social group at Wamba. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 4967-4967. [61] Ueno H., Suemitsu S., Murakami S., Kitamura N., Wani K., Matsumoto Y., & Ishihara T. (2019). Helping-like behaviour in mice towards conspecifics constrained inside tubes. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 5817. [62] Ueno H., Suemitsu S., Murakami S., Kitamura N., Wani K., Okamoto M., & Ishihara T. (2018). Empathic behavior according to the state of others in mice. Brain and Behavior, 8(7), Article e00986. [63] Vanderschuren L. J., Niesink R. J., & van Pee, J. M. (1997). The neurobiology of social play behavior in rats. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(3), 309-326. [64] Zahn-Waxler C., Radke-Yarrow M., Wagner E., & Chapman M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 126-136. |
[1] | 许文涛, 张凯丽, 汪凤炎. 美德与享乐动机对精神幸福感的不同作用*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 902-909. |
[2] | 蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 冯毛, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 自尊与中学生问题性手机使用:社交焦虑和逃避动机的中介作用*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 940-946. |
[3] | 宋艾珈, 段锦云. 寻求者注视方向及面部表情对建议者建议提出的影响*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(3): 718-725. |
[4] | 江语童, 李红, 孟现鑫. “关怀的代价”——共情疲劳的评估及干预*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(3): 752-759. |
[5] | 范伟, 杨颖, 董艳秋, 张文洁. 竞争情境下奖赏动机对自我欺骗的影响:眼动证据*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(2): 411-423. |
[6] | 姜甜甜, 曹阳, 龚少英, 刘小先, 吴亚男, 郎悦茹. 教师自主支持对高中生网络学习投入的影响:自主动机和主动性人格的作用*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1336-1343. |
[7] | 刘小禹, 付静宇, 刘军. 魅力领导的两面性对下属公民疲劳的影响机制研究 *[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1114-1122. |
[8] | 吴奇, 谭惠中. 我看不到你的疼痛:隐性自恋特质与疼痛共情的关系 *[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1212-1219. |
[9] | 张环, 李婧文, 王海曼, 沙玛丽·阿哈提, 何云凤, 卢春明. 共情在社会互动提取中的作用:第二人称的视角 *[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1254-1261. |
[10] | 高彬, 贾莹芳, 姜云鹏, 吴捷. 奖赏动机对自动反应抑制的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 795-801. |
[11] | 王博 刘向萌 毕重增. 内隐与外显自信分离对建议采纳的影响:任务复杂度的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 660-667. |
[12] | 徐雅诗 赵海玲 刘洁 崔芳. 高共情,更公平:共情特质调节可识别受害者效应引起的资源分配不公[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(2): 427-434. |
[13] | 孙炳海 岳腾宇 李伟健 邵雨婷. 耳听为“实”,眼见为“虚”:推断任务对共情准确性视听通道效应的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(2): 299-306. |
[14] | 贾磊 郑峥 汪俊. 医学生疼痛共情的认知过程特征:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(6): 1508-1516. |
[15] | 杜秀芳 胡卫红 王静 李方. 情境公开性与印象管理动机对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1198-1205. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||