|
The Current State and Future Directions of Environmental Psychology: A Bibliometric Analysis of JEVP and EB Publications over the Past 30 Years
Dong Bo, Wang Wei, Qin Sisi, Tian Xiaoming
2025, 48(2):
495-511.
DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20250221
This paper presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 2,851 articles published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology (JEVP) and Environment and Behavior (EB) from 1990 to 2022 using the CiteSpace software. The study aims to provide an in-depth examination of the evolving trends, influential researchers, central themes, and future directions that have characterized the field of environmental psychology over the past three decades. The analysis identifies four major trends shaping the current landscape of environmental psychology. First, the geographic distribution of influential research has shifted from a U.S.-centric focus to a more globally representative network, with increasing contributions from countries such as the Netherlands, Germany, and Australia. This shift reflects the growing international commitment to environmental psychology, promoting a cross-cultural and inclusive understanding of environmental issues beyond traditional geographic boundaries. Second, the field has developed around nine core themes that reflect the discipline’s engagement with both foundational and emerging issues. Key themes include environmental perception;, environmental preference, and place attachment, which have long been central topics in the field. More recent themes, such as pro-environmental behavior, pro-environmental attitudes, and environmental activism, have gained prominence in response to contemporary concerns around sustainability, ecological responsibility, and climate change. These themes indicate that future research will likely emphasize topics related to climate change, green consumption, and sustained pro-environmental behavior, marking a shift from traditional environmental psychology topics toward addressing urgent global challenges. Third, the findings suggest a significant shift in the field’s underlying theoretical perspective;, moving from an anthropocentric (human-centered) to an ecocentric (ecological-centered) orientation. This shift represents an expanded recognition within the field of the interconnectedness of human behavior and environmental sustainability. While traditional environmental psychology focused primarily on human responses to the environment, contemporary research increasingly explores how ecological health impacts human well-being. This shift underscores a deeper integration of ecological and ethical considerations into the study of human-environment relationships and positions environmental psychology to address pressing issues such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Fourth, the analysis reveals a notable fragmentation of research topics and methodological approaches within environmental psychology. This fragmentation is evident in both the distribution of high-impact publications and the thematic clusters identified in this study. The findings indicate that the field has grown beyond a unified, centralized body of knowledge to encompass diverse perspectives, methodologies, and subfields. Although this diversity allows environmental psychology to engage in a variety of complex topics, it also poses challenges for the development of a cohesive theoretical and methodological framework. Consequently, one of the future challenges for environmental psychology will be to reconcile these diverse research directions into a more integrated framework that effectively addresses the core questions of the field. Solving this fragmentation issue is essential to the future development of environmental psychology. This study proposes that the field should focus on four primary tasks: (1) clarifying and popularizing the core concept of “Human-Environment Relationships”, (2) redefining the scope of “environment”, (3) establishing foundational theories or paradigms for environmental psychology, and (4) constructing a structured content framework around this core concept. The first task—promoting a clear understanding of “Human-Environment Relationships”—is primarily an issue of outreach and education. Therefore;, this paper emphasizes the latter three tasks as essential steps in advancing the field. First, regarding the redefinition of “environment”, the study advocates viewing it as a complex system that integrates physical, social, virtual, and other layers. This redefinition recognizes that today’s environments are not limited to physical spaces but extend to virtual and data-driven settings that reshape how people interact with their surroundings. Second;, to establish a theoretical foundation, this study suggests constructing a new paradigm characterized by ecological and dynamic perspectives to accommodate the evolving nature of person-environment relationships. Finally, this study proposes a three-dimensional framework consisting of spatial scale, temporal scale, and the core of person-environment relation to create a structured content model for the field. This framework is intended to create a systematic structure for environmental psychology research, ensuring that studies are aligned with the discipline’s core concept of person-environment relationships. The spatial scale dimension includes the different physical and psychological spaces that environmental psychology examines;, from the personal and home environments to community, urban, and global contexts. By addressing different spatial scales, researchers can systematically analyze how environmental factors influence individuals, groups, and societies across diverse settings. The temporal scale dimension reflects the time-dependent nature of human-environment interactions, covering short-term responses to immediate environmental factors, medium-term adaptation processes, and long-term developmental impacts. This dimension underscores not only the duration of environmental effects but also the adaptive processes that unfold over time, revealing both immediate and cumulative influences on psychological outcomes. The core of person-environment relation dimension represents the fundamental nature of human-environment interactions, organized into four perspectives: individual-centered, environment-centered, interactive systems, and emergent coexistence. The core of person-environment relation dimension addresses varied theoretical viewpoints, from considering individuals as active processors of environmental information to conceiving the environment as an autonomous influence that shapes human behavior, emphasizing dynamic and emergent qualities in these interactions. This three-dimensional framework may help environmental psychology better organize research themes systematically, facilitating a clearer understanding of the complex, multi-layered relationships between individuals and their environments. The framework not only serves as a tool for organizing existing research but also as a guide for identifying and creating new research directions based on the core question of person-environment relationships. By structuring the discipline in this way, environmental psychology can enhance dialogue and integration across various research areas, providing theoretical and practical support to address today’s environmental challenges. In conclusion;, this study offers a comprehensive overview of the current state of environmental psychology and identifies future directions through a bibliometric analysis of JEVP and EB publications. The findings emphasize that the future of environmental psychology requires a clarified core concept, a unifying theoretical framework, and a structured content model. Such an approach enables environmental psychology to contribute valuable insights and theoretical foundations for addressing real-world environmental issues, ultimately supporting a more sustainable and ecologically aware society.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|